Legal Opinion

Paddon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1924No. Civ. No. 4888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] It appearing to the court that proceedings were pending charging the petitioner, William Locke Paddon, with contempt of the orders of the trial court at the time the order herein sought to be reviewed was made; and it further appearing that the said William Locke Paddon is the real party in interest herein;

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of prohibition be denied upon the authority of Knoob v. Knoob, 192 Cal. 95 [218 P. 568], Soderberg v. Soderberg, 63 Cal.App. 492 [219 P. 82], and Weeks v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 620 [203 P. 93].

All the Justices concurred.

A petition for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Knoob v. KnoobCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Soderberg v. SoderbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tobin v. CasausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Stone v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Travis v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Funfar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Estate of ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API