Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

This is a Federal Tort Claims Action arising out of an injury sustained by plaintiff Robert J. Anderson while working under contract with Native American Consultants, Incorporated (“NAC”) at the Defense Personnel Support Center. Defendants, the United States of America and the Defense Personnel Support Center (“DPSC”), a part of the federal government, 1 have moved for summary judgment based upon two arguments: 1) that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action because plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by William Sheppard, Insurance Commissioner v. National Association of Flood Insurers, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maria Moya, as Personal Representative, for the Estate of Andelicio Moya v. United States of America, Department of Veteran's AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API