Legal Opinion

Webb v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 29, 2011No. SC 91012Published

1Opinion of the Court

334 S.W.3d 126 (2011)

Eric WEBB, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. SC 91012.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

March 29, 2011.

Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender's Office, Columbia, for Webb.

John W. Grantham, Attorney General's Office, Jefferson City, for the State.

2Per curiam

Introduction

Eric Webb, an intoxicated driver who pleaded guilty to first-degree involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action, alleges that he did not receive effective representation when he pleaded guilty because his attorney misled him by telling him that he would not be subject to the law requiring him to serve…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Wolff; Dissent · Fischer; Concurrence · Wolff; Dissent · Fischer.

3Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API