Opinion No. (2000)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Senate Muegge:
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:
1. Under the Oklahoma Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Act, 2 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1999, §§ 9-200-9-215, do any provisions of law require the Department of Agriculture to afford notification or an administrative hearing to "affected property owners," as that term is defined in the Act, in connection with an application for the renewal of a license to operate a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation?
2. If the answer to the first question…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.