Nason Manuf'g Co v. Craft Refrigerating Mach. Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the Nason Manufacturing Company against the Craft Eefrigerating Machine Company. From an order denying a motion to vacate an attachment, defendant appeals. Affirmed. The affidavit on which the attachment was granted is as follows: Samuel Greason, being duly sworn, says: That he is treasurer and general manager of the Nason Manufacturing Company, the plaintiff herein.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the Nason Manufacturing Company against the Craft Eefrigerating Machine Company. From an order denying a motion to vacate an attachment, defendant appeals. Affirmed. The affidavit on which the attachment was granted is as follows: Samuel Greason, being duly sworn, says: That he is treasurer and general manager of the Nason Manufacturing Company, the plaintiff herein. (1) That the plaintiff above named, a domestic corporation, organized and created under the laws of the state of New York, is entitled to recover from the defendant above…
1Per curiam
The attachment was granted upon an affidavit •and complaint, both of which were verified by Samuel G-reason on September 5, 1894. The cause of action was for goods sold and .services performed during a period of about 15 months prior to and *1033ending on August 22,1894. Mr. Greason swears in Ms affidavit used upon the attachment that he is the treasurer and general manager of the plaintiff. The two objections presented against the sufficiency of such affidavit and complaint are that there is no allegation that the goods were reasonably worth any sum, and that it is not stated that at the time the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Washburn v. Carthage Nat. BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895