Legal Opinion

Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 4, 1973No. 878-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

This appeal raises a single question: Does a lien asserted under RCW 60.04.100 expire, where service of the summons and complaint to foreclose it is not made on a necessary party within 8 months of the date when notice of claim of lien is filed? We hold that the lien does expire.

The facts are undisputed. Appellant, Curtis Lumber Company, delivered material to a construction site on certain property near Lacey, Washington in May, 1971. Washington Mutual Savings Bank recorded a mortgage on that property on June 22, 1971. On August 26, 1971, Curtis filed a notice of claim of lien against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. BartzWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. City Sash & Door Co. v. BunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Yakima Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Galvanizer's Co. v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. MB Construction Co. v. O'Brien Commerce Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API