Legal Opinion
United States v. Rueth Development Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 21, 2002No. 2:96CV540PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY, District Judge.
The United States of America, acting on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), moves to enforce a consent decree between EPA and Rueth Development Company and Harold G. Rueth (“Defendants”), entered with this court on January 26,1999 (“Consent Decree”). Defendants have filed cross-motions for dispute resolution and modification. Since the court feels the parties’ briefs are adequate to address all the issues presented, a hearing is not necessary and therefore Defendants’ “Request for Evidentiary Hearing on Pending Motions” is DENIED. For the reasons…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006