Legal Opinion
O'Herin v. Neal
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 1, 1932No. 4273PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlalock, Chief Justice
(after stating the case as above).
Appellant presents as grounds for reversal the action of the court in holding the contract inadequate and insufficient to form the basis of an action for specific performance. The contract reads as follows:
“I am to pay H. T. Neal $750.00 for one-fourth interest in royalty.
“[Signed] P. T. O’Herin.
“I will deliver to P. T. O’Herin for $750.00' J. Z. Form without change a royalty deed for one-fourth interest in 41 ½ acres laying northwest of Kilgore, Texas, and joining the West Daniel Land.
“[Signed] H. T. Neal.
“Same to be executed on or before 2/23/1931.”
It will…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patton v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Jones v. CarverTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Whitehead v. ReigerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Higgins v. Bankers' Mortgage Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Cassidy-Southwestern Commission Co. v. Chupick Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
3Cited by27 opinions
- Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Pick v. BartelTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Rowson v. RowsonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. DauleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.