Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 2011No. 3D09-3381PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

Alejandro Rodriguez" (“the defendant”) appeals from an order finding the child-victim’s hearsay statements were reliable, and therefore admissible evidence pursuant to section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (2008). Because the trial court complied with the statute, the trial court’s written order applied the proper analysis, and the trial court’s findings are supported by the record, we affirm.

The defendant was charged by information with six counts of sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age by a person eighteen years of age or older; two counts of lewd and lascivious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Pedrosa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Platt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Alejandro Rodriguez v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  4. Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Carlos Martinez-Urbina v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API