Legal Opinion

Kytle v. Stewart Title Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 26, 1992No. Civ. A. H-91-0436PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HUGHES, District Judge.

1. Introduction.

The Kytles are seeking to recover money they expended on medical care that they claim should have been covered by their insurance through the Stewart Benefit Trust. They were not, however, covered for the month when they incurred the expenses. Their statutorily required post-termination coverage had expired, and they did not have a right to convert their insurance to a private policy. The Kytles will take nothing on their claim against Prudential Insurance Company, Stewart Title Company, Stewart Benefit Trust, and its trustees.

2…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy A. Cefalu v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Karin Pedersen Brock, Wife Of/and Keith Brock v. Primedica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Porto v. Armco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boucher v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1998
  2. Rucker v. Pacific FM, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
  3. Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API