Hobbs Water Co. v. Madera
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
This is an action on a promissory note. Defendants admitted its execution, but denied liability and affirmatively alleged that they entered into negotiations with the plaintiff for the purchase of a pump for the purpose of pumping and furnishing water to others; that plaintiff represented to the defendants that plaintiff had a pump which was in first-class working condition and which had had new working parts installed therein, and that plaintiff guaranteed the pump to perforn? satisfactorily and to pump sufficient water for defendant’s use; that said representations were…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Floeck v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Alvarez v. AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Witherspoon v. BrummettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.