Legal Opinion

Hobbs Water Co. v. Madera

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1938No. 4339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

This is an action on a promissory note. Defendants admitted its execution, but denied liability and affirmatively alleged that they entered into negotiations with the plaintiff for the purchase of a pump for the purpose of pumping and furnishing water to others; that plaintiff represented to the defendants that plaintiff had a pump which was in first-class working condition and which had had new working parts installed therein, and that plaintiff guaranteed the pump to perforn? satisfactorily and to pump sufficient water for defendant’s use; that said representations were…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Floeck v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Alvarez v. AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Witherspoon v. BrummettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API