Legal Opinion
Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp. v. Chock Full of Power Gasoline Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
A filling station owner agrees to purchase all his gasoline products requirements from a single oil *315company or its distributors. May that agreement, if recorded in the .real estate records of the County Clerk, impose itself automatically upon subsequent owners who do not assume it? The question is a novel one in New York.
On February 10, 1965, Linmont Properties Inc. (Linmont) purchased and was deeded a corner lot from Newman, Nager and Wolf (NN&W), who were individual distributors of American Oil Company (Amoco) products, in order to construct and operate a filling station. A “ requirements ”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Miller v. . ClaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp. v. Chock Full of Power Gasoline Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973