Legal Opinion
Landreman v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 28, 1995No. 94-2189PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Earl Landreman, Richard Lander-man, Eugenie Bodenhoff, Delores Perry, Charles Scully, Larry Gerondale and Gerald Maloch (collectively the investors) appeal an order granting Pet Martin's, Joy Sundberg's and Carol Ervin's motions to dismiss. Landreman contends that Martin was properly served with the summons and complaint; the trial court did have personal jurisdiction over Sundberg and Ervin and that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply under the circumstances. Because we conclude that Martin was properly served, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. However, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kohler Co. v. WixenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Turner v. MartireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Koscielak v. Stockbridge-Munsee CommunityCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- Tym v. LudwigCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Regal Ware, Inc. v. TSCO CORP.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.