Legal Opinion

Britton v. City of Lakewood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1950No. 21896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARPENTER, J.:

The plaintiff alleged and her evidence tended to prove that she sustained an injury from a fall when she stepped into a hole on the tree lawn of one of the defendant’s streets and that the hole was covered with grass and weeds and she could not see it before she stepped into it; also, that that condition of nuisance had existed for several years and was known to the city or should have been in the exercise of reasonable care. For the resulting damage she sustained she asked judgment against the defendant, basing her claim on §3714 GC.

The answer was a general denial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearlstein v. A. M. McGregor HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Tarian v. City of AllianceOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ricks v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API