United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentWardlaw, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The majority, by agreeing that Brenda Working’s conduct warrants departure for aberrance, has found new meaning in the term — one not supported by our jurisprudence and one which, by its sheer expansiveness, is at odds with the views of every other circuit. Brenda Working committed a premeditated attempted murder, “attempted” only because her relentless and cold-blooded assault on her husband was thwarted by his equally relentless will to survive. She compounded her crime by destroying evidence and lying to the police in an effort to conceal what she believed to be the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. James E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Irma Pena, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. GrandmaisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Devon LIPMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.