Legal Opinion

People v. Pikunas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, Ch. J.

The record in this case is not a satisfactory one on which to deprive a fifteen-year old child of her liberty, with proper regard for due legal process. Juvenile delinquency is not a crime and the acts charged here do not involve any crime. (Children’s Court Act [L. 1922, ch. 547, as amd. L. 1930, ch. 393], § 45; Penal Law, § 2186.) The strict rules of criminal procedure for the protection of parties accused of crime are, therefore, inapplicable to the proceedings. Full and complete records must be kept. (Children’s Court Act, § 45.) Some degree of informality is to be expected.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In re Carmelo E.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Murphy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Sharp v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API