Legal Opinion

Kestler v. Weissenfels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to impress upon certain realty a lien of $3,300, paid by the plaintiff to the seller. The lis pendens and verified complaint in the action were filed on June 24, 1933, at ten-thirty-four a. m. The deed of the defendants who took title to the property from the seller, who was obligated to repay the plaintiff $3,300, was not recorded until ten-fifty-one a. m. on June 24, 1933, seventeen minutes after the lis pendens' *889was filed. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The literal language of section 121 of the Civil Practice Act requires a holding that the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kursheedt v. Union Dime Savings InstitutionNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. People's Trust Co. v. TonkonogyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Mechanics Exchange Savings Bank v. ChesterfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Stevens v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Brandstetter v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API