Legal Opinion

State v. Nettz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 1, 1977No. 2 CA-CR 850-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

On October 1, 1974, defendant, Julie Marie Nettz, endorsed two dividend checks payable to Ivan Heller with the name of Ivan Heller. She was found guilty of forgery, A.R.S. § 13^421(A)(1) by a jury on July 31, 1975. The trial judge, however, granted her motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 24.2, Rules of Criminal Procedure. The state appeals this ruling.

The crime of forgery has three elements: (1) signing the name of another person, (2) intent to defraud, and (3) knowledge that there is no authority to sign. A.R.S. § 13-421(A)(1). At trial, defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. FerrariArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. PolanArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Laks v. LaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State v. CassiusArizona Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. MataArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. North Star Development Corp. v. WolfswinkelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API