Legal Opinion

T. W. Snook & Son v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Macomb; Tucker, J. Assumpsit by Thomas W. Snook & Son, a copartnership consisting of John R. Snook, the estate of Thomas W. Snook and others, against the Mt. Clemens Sugar Company for breach of a contract of sale. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by plaintiffs against defendant for the price and value of certain sugar barrels manufactured by plaintiffs for defendant, wherein plaintiffs recovered judgment.

Plaintiffs were engaged in manufacturing barrels at Mt. Clemens, and in 1905 defendant company, of the same place, requiring a large number of sugar barrels for the campaign of 1905-1906, asked plaintiffs for quotations on barrels, and by letters which passed between the parties a contract was entered into, as follows:

“Office of T. W. Snook & Son. Manufacturers of Staves and Heading.
“Mt. Clemens,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snook v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API