Koganaluk v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Joe Koganaluk was convicted of sexual assault in the first degree, in violation of AS 11.41.410(a)(1). 1 He was thereafter sentenced to serve a period of ten years’ imprisonment. Koganaluk now appeals, alleging that the sentence he received is excessive. We affirm.
In claiming that his sentence is excessive, Koganaluk places primary emphasis on the argument that his sentence is equivalent to the ten-year presumptive term prescribed for a second felony offender committing the same class of offense. In advancing this argument, Koganaluk relies on our decision in Austin v. State, 627 P.2d…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Maal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Seymore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Pittenger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.