Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nation v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1981No. 2-281A36Published

1DissentBuchanan, Chief Justice

Unlike the majority, I believe the record does demonstrate that Nation, knowing of his right to be represented by counsel, voluntarily and intelligently relinquished that right. Nation has raised three additional issues, none of which presents reversible error. Because I would affirm the judgment of conviction, I discuss all of the issues in logical sequence; the majority reverses on the basis of Issue II.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the State disclose that on July 20, 1979, Thomas King (King) introduced seventeen-year-old Janice Marie Longworth (Longworth) to Nation. Longworth testified…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API