Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sheen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 29, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lee L. Holzman, J.

The issue presented by the respondents’ motion in limine is whether the Judge who had presided over settlement discussions may be subpoenaed to testify as a witness in this proceeding to set aside the settlement which had been entered into on the record before the Judge. Specifically, petitioners want the Judge to testify about the representations made by *921the parties during the negotiations at the conference conducted by her. Respondents seek an order precluding petitioners from seeking to impeach the prior settlement through the testimony of the Judge.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gold v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API