Legal Opinion

Mathews Slate Co. v. Sweeney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The case was submitted on briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action brought against the sureties upon a bond given to dissolve an attachment by trustee process. The original writ in the action on which the bond was given described the plaintiff as the Mathews Consolidated Slate Company. By amendment allowed in the Superior Court after the bond had been given, the Mathews Slate Company was substituted as the plaintiff. This amendment was allowed without notice to the defendant Sweeney in this action, who alone is defending it.

The Mathews Consolidated Slate Company and the Mathews Slate Company are two distinct and separate corporations.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Prince v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Richards v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Savage v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Mass. Building Finish Co. v. BrennerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Michelin Tire Co. v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Werlin v. Equitable Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Patch v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API