State v. Hjerstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of burglary, Minn. Stat. § 609.58, subd. 2(3) (1976), and theft of property valued at more than $100, § 609.-52, subds. 2(1) and 3(2), and was sentenced by the trial court to concurrent terms of 5 years in prison. On this direct appeal defendant contends that he should be given a new trial because the trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting, over objection, (1) testimony by the police concerning self-contradictory statements defendant made in a general exculpatory statement he gave when arrested,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Charles E. WigginsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- State v. HaglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. RuizIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.