Legal Opinion

Silco, Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 23, 1984No. CA-3-81-2117-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.

Came on for consideration before the Court a civil action for a refund of federal income taxes paid by plaintiff, Silco, Inc. (Silco). The case has been submitted for determination on stipulated facts. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). Having considered the parties’ briefs and the relevant case law, as well as having heard oral argument of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the claim for refund should be denied. Accordingly, judgment shall be entered in favor of the United States.

I. Facts and Issue

This is an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Stubbs, Overbeck & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silco, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Caruth v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API