Legal Opinion

Romanik v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1975No. 46768PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

We allowed leave to appeal in this case to review a judgment of the Fifth District Appellate Court (19 Ill. App. 3d 431), which held that a probationary police patrolman could not be discharged without a formal hearing after notice of the grounds for the discharge. We reverse that judgment.

The probationary patrolman, Robert Romanik, was discharged by the East St. Louis Board of Fire and Police Commissioners during his probationary period. The Board acted on the written recommendation of the chief of the department which was accompanied by a record of the occurrences upon which it was based.

Rom…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fish v. McGannIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Collins v. TowleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. People ex rel. Betts v. Village of MaywoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. Romanik v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Redd v. NolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Krecek v. Board of Police Commissioners of La Grange ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Lewis v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Rochon v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API