Legal Opinion
In re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 27, 2007No. MDL Docket No. 1629; Master File No. 04-10981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Docket # 850)
SOROKIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In May, 2005, the Sales and Marketing Plaintiffs served non-party Cline Davis & Mann, Inc. (“CDM”) with a subpoena seeking documents related to the instant litigation. In November, 2006, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel CDM to comply with the subpoena. On December 20, 2006, the Court ordered CDM to produce all documents sought by the subpoena by February 1, 2007. CDM filed an objection to the motion in two letters to Judge Saris. CDM contended at that time that this Court did not have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc. General Nutrition Corporation and General Nutrition Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc., Hca, Inc. And West Paces Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Litigat.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lynch v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2019