Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1907Published

Action by George Hall against the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company.

1Dissent

McLENNAN, P. j.,

dissents, and votes for reversal on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law (Fiddler v. N. Y. C., etc., 64 App. Div. 95, 71 N. Y. Supp. 721 ; Fealey v. Bull, 163 N. Y. 397. 57 N. E. 631 ; Culhane v. N. Y. C., etc., 60 N. Y. 133 : Rich v. Pa. R. R. Co., 112 App. Div. 818. 98 N. Y. Supp. 678), and also on the ground that the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate cause of the accident was contrary to and against the weight of evidence.

ROBSON, J., not voting.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Culhane v. . N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Fealey v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Fiddler v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Rich v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906