Legal Opinion
Izzo v. Kirby
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
Petitioner moves for an order directing the Suffolk County Welfare Commissioner to issue a letter to petitioner’s employer, pursuant to section 137-a of the Social Services Law (formerly known as Social Welfare Law), to cease and desist from taking money out of his gross weekly salary under an income execution served by the Sheriff of Suffolk County. Section 137-a exempts the earnings of a recipient of public assistance or care supplementary to his income pursuant to the Social Services Law, from attachment by an income execution. Petitioner asserts his right to the letter, by reason of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kupferman v. New York State Board of Social WelfareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Cristenfeld v. MeisserNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Gorfinkel v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. SitonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Botwin v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.