International & G. N. R. Co. v. Walters
Court of Appeals of Texas
On second motion for rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtMotjrstind, J.
Because of the additional fact found by us on motion for rehearing, we have entertained and considered a second motion for rehearing, which presents appel- lee’s contentions based upon such additional finding.
[1-5] No brief was filed by appellee in this case, and consequently no objection was made to the consideration of the assignment of error sustained by us until upon motion for rehearing. The objection came too late, but it must be admitted that the only proposition submitted under the assignment was entirely too general. The assignment complains of the charge. No objections are stated in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. WiningerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Teague v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Johnson v. Texas & Gulf Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- H. E. Butt Grocery Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915