Legal Opinion

Novogrod v. Kayne's Inc.

United States District Court

Decided April 19, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proctor, D. C. J.

The basic question to be decided is whether or not a judgment rendered by a Small Cause Court in excess of its jurisdiction may be attacked collaterally.

This is an action in replevin based upon the following facts: A judgment was obtained in this court for the Speed-O-Print Corporation against Kayne’s, Incorporated. Execution was issued, levy made and a sale was held of the articles mentioned in the writ of replevin on February 3d, 1938. The plaintiff was the purchaser of the aforesaid articles at that sale.

In the defense of the present action it appears that one, Hubler,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re HallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  2. Palmer v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Aumack v. CottonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of StrubleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917
  5. Jackson v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API