Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 1977No. 77-801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. However, the judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating that appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). In addition, the language ordering appellant to be confined “at hard labor” is improper because no existing state statute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. MoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API