Bowman v. Tax Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.
The real controversy between the Bow-mans' and the Tax Commission is whether these contracts are to be considered as life insurance units and annuity units, or are to be considered as contracts of general investment. The plaintiffs claim that each of these contracts is an insurance and annuity contract combined, the insurance part of which is' exempt from taxation under Section 5414-10, General Code, while the income yield on the annuity portion is subject to taxation, to be computed as four per cent of one-half of the purchase price of the annuity feature, in accordance with Section 5389,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thornton v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Cassidy v. EllerhorstOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Ballou v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Citicasters Co. v. Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Keller's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- First Natl. Bank of Omaha v. iBeam Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.