Legal Opinion
James v. Roberts
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The control of the county court and courts of equitable jurisdiction in the matter of the custody of children when incidental to guardianship proceedings was not disturbed by the legislation with reference to neglected and dependent or delinquent children. Sec. 48.01 (5) (a), Stats., part of the Children’s Code, provides:
“Nothing contained herein shall deprive other courts of the right to determine the custody of children upon writs of habeas corpus, or when such custody is incidental to the determination of causes pending in such courts.”
This is a proceeding in the guardianship matter and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Guardianship of KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- In re StittgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Macgill v. McEvoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- In re AndrewsNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
3Cited by4 opinions
- Petition of LoudinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Carlson v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- King v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Guardianship of PerkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946