Legal Opinion

State v. Dimond

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1928No. 6,289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

By information Jack Dimond and another were charged with stealing “five Ford wire wheels and tires of the value of One Hundred and Ten ($110) Dollars.” Dimond pleaded not guilty. Separate trials were granted each defendant. The jury found Dimond guilty of petit larceny. Judgment was entered on the verdict. He appealed from the judgment and later from an order denying him a new trial.

The specification of errors presents four points: (1) The information does not state a public offense; (2) there was no sufficient proof of venue; (3) there was no sufficient proof of value of the articles alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Territory v. ShipleyMontana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Culliton v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API