National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
Petitioners in these CPLR article 78 proceedings challenge the determination by respondent that the West Side Connec*129tion Project for the construction of a new railroad line, whereby passenger train service between New York City and points north and west via Albany would originate and terminate at New York City’s Pennsylvania Station, involves a contract with a governmental agency for a public works project and, hence, is subject to this State’s mandatory prevailing wage rate statute for workers employed on the project (see, Labor Law § 220). The essential facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- 60 Market Street Associates v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Vulcan Affordable Housing Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- 120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Pyramid Co. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- New York Charter School Ass'n v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pyramid Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Western Alaska Building & Construction Trades Council v. Inn-Vestment Associates of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.