Legal Opinion

Roper v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 5, 1933No. 13,249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

This is a mandamus proceeding brought in the district court of Pueblo county against the insurer of an employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Colorado. The petitioner sought to compel payment of an amount which he alleged to be due under a certain “rule of procedure” adopted by the Industrial Commission in 1928, but now superseded. The court declined to issue the writ, and the petitioner asks for a reversal.

The controversy has been before us at a previous stage. Industrial Commission v. Roper, 91 Colo. 125, 12 P. (2d) 349. That was a proceeding* for review under the procedure…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Industrial Commission v. RoperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. MGM Supply Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. Kent RYSER v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  5. Vigil v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API