Legal Opinion

Sussex v. Snyder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 42,301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

On October 13, 1941, plaintiff began a law action against defendants George E. Snyder and his wife, Elizabeth Snyder, and writ of garnishment was issued against the Union City National Bank as garnishee defendant. On October 30, 1941, the bank filed disclosure, stating in substance that defendants Snyder and wife had a joint-deposit checking account in the bank, subject to checks drawn by either of them, in which account there was on deposit the sum of $1,498.53. On January 12, 1942, an order of voluntary nonsuit was entered as to defendant Elizabeth Snyder. On January 13th plaintiff obtained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Crampton v. CramptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Creedon v. LundyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bowditch v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. H. A. Hoxie & Co. v. AshtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Department of Treasury v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In Re Renz'EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Danielson v. LazoskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Drummonds v. DrummondsMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API