Baumer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the doctrine of law of the case precludes the District Court from ascertaining the value of an option on the date it was granted. We hold that it does. The District Court’s order is reversed and remanded with directions to ascertain the value in accordance with the prior panel’s ruling.
I. Background
On January 30, 1966, the Seven Eighty-Eight Greenwood Avenue Corporation (Corporation) contracted to purchase a parcel of residential property for $175,000. Erwin G. Baumer (Father) was the sole shareholder of Corporation. When…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Harold B. Schwartz and Eric Rosenbaum v. Nms Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Rollen Jackson v. State of Alabama State TenureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Heriberto Fernandez MonsisvaisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.