Legal Opinion

Secor v. Harris

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Motion by the plaintiff for a new trial, upon a bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This is an action for slander. Upon .the trial of the cause the plaintiff proved the following words, which were also alleged in the complaint: “ Doctor Secor killed my children” “ He gave them tea-spoonful doses of calomel, and they died.” “Dr. Secor gave them tea-spoonful doses of calomel, and it killed them ; they did not live long after they took it. They died right off—the same day.” The plaintiff was proved to be a practising physician, and the evidence shows that he had practised in the defendant’s family, and had prescribed for the defendant’s children, and that the words were spoken…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foot v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1811

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cruikshank v. . GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. High v. Supreme Lodge of the WorldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Carroll v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Gauvreau v. Superior Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Murphy v. Maui Publishing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API