Legal Opinion

Siddall v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1918No. 7505Published

Appeal from District Court, Grimes County; S. W. Dean, Judge. Suit for mandamus by B. M. Hudson against George E. Siddall. From judgment for plaintiff, respondent appeals.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

In a very ably written motion for rehearing appellee strongly contends that this court erred in holding that the land he sought to have surveyed, that is, the abandoned bed of a navigable river, was not state land, but took on the nature of an accretion or reliction to the lands bordering the old bed upon both sides.

[3] In support of this position, after assuming that the brief statement in our former opinion of the circumstances under which the Brazos changed its course in 1832 constituted avulsion rather than the slower and more gradual result known as accretion or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Cooley v. GoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Benson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Buse v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API