Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Heinze

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1916Published

Application by Otto 0. Heinze asking: (1) That letters of administration be revoked. (2) For reargument of an order denying application to be appointed administrator and for vacation of that order. (3) For reargument of an order appointing a guardian and for a vacation of such order.

1Opinion of the Court

Ostrander, S. —

This is an application by Otto 0. Heinze, asking:(1) That letters of. administration issued to Walter A. Fullerton upon the estate of F. Augustus Heinze, be revoked.(2) For reargument of an order of this court denying his application to be appointed as administrator of F. Augustus Heinze and for vacation of that order.(3) For reargument of an order of this court appointing Walter A. Fullerton as guardian of the property of F. Augustus Heinze, Jr., and a vacation of such order and for the appointment of said Otto 0. Heinze as such guardian.

Otto 0. Heinze has no present financial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Craig v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API