Legal Opinion

Elliott Addressing Mach. Co. v. Addressing Typewriter Stencil Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

Upon the argument of the instant motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants’ alleged infringement of certain claims of Fuller patent, No. 1,101,268, and Belknap patent, No. 1,256,509, counsel for defendants frankly stated that as to the first of these grants the only question before the court is as to whether “aluminum sulphate is a coagulant in that portion of the chemical field which is known as colloidal chemistry.” If it be held to be such, the infringement is admitted.

In my opinion, the proof now before the court requires the issue to be resolved against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Von Lepel v. Times Square Stores Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API