Legal Opinion · Dissent

Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1984Published

1Dissent

Kassal, J. (dissenting).

The issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment in this negligence action. Special Term granted the motion and the majority has affirmed, concluding that defendant, through the actions of its driver, was negligent as a matter of law. We disagree. The inferences reasonably capable of being drawn as to whether defendant’s conduct was negligent under the circumstances are matters exclusively for *34the trier of the facts, not for the court in a fact-finding determination.

On July 11, 1981, at or about 8:00 p.m., a hot summer’s night, Edwin…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Moskowitz v. GarlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API