Legal Opinion

Rader v. Simmons

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and taxable disbursements to the plaintiff, and motion granted, without costs.

The defendant’s right to retain the moneys taken from the possession of the plaintiff on the occasion of the latter’s arrest may only be derived from section 435-4.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. This section is construed as applying only to the retention of moneys to be used as evidence or which constitute the proceeds of a crime with which the plaintiff had *138been formally charged. Defendant does not contend that the moneys are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Clark v. Tri-State Discount Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  3. Sheary v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rader v. SimmonsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  2. Rader v. SimmonsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API