Legal Opinion
Morella v. MacHu
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 11, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 N.J. Super. 604 (1989)
563 A.2d 881
TINA A. MORELLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
JOSEPH E. MACHU, JR., JOSEPH MACHU, MARK KAMATOY AND EDUARDO KAMATOY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 1, 1989.
Decided September 11, 1989.
Before Judges KING, ASHBEY and SKILLMAN.
Michael D. Schottland, argued the cause for appellants (Chamlin, Schottland, Rosen, Cavanagh & Uliano, attorneys; Charles A. Costanzo and Vincent P. Manning, on the brief).
John Haschak, III, argued the cause for respondents (Leary, Bride, Tinker & Moran, attorneys).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Piscitelli v. CLASSIC RESIDENCENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Dower v. GambaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Camp v. LumminoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Estate of Narleski v. GomesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Estate of Brandon Tyler Narleski v. Nicholas Gomes (083169)(Middlesex County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.