Legal Opinion

Malmud v. Blackman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

The judgment creditor has moved to punish the judgment debtor for contempt, charging, among other things, that he gave false testimony upon two examinations in supplementary proceedings. The issues on the motion were referred to an official referee to hear and report with his opinion. Such report has been submitted. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss *163the referee’s report in detail. It is a comprehensive document, clearly- indicating the painstaking care and study that the referee devoted to the matter. The referee’s findings are that the judgment debtor, on a number of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moffat v. . HermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Matter of Foster v. HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. In re GoslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Macmay Realty Corp. v. KatzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett Bros. v. Floyd Bennett Farmers Market Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API