Wagner v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Wagner was indicted, tried, and convicted of forgery and of uttering a forged instrument. The two counts in the indictment were based on the same instrument — a promissory note for $200. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction. Wagner prosecutes error in this court.
Several grounds of error are assigned. We are unable to sustain any, save one. Wagner testified in his own defense, and in his cross-examination counsel for the state was permitted, over the objection and exception of Wagner, to ask him if he had not been indicted for other acts of forgery and of…
2Cited by30 opinions
- State v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Malone v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. CoxOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.