Legal Opinion

Agramonte v. Marvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 9, 2004, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to plaintiffs-appellants on the ground that they did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs received physical therapy for three months after the accident but sought no other treatment until two years later, shortly after defendants made the first of their motions for summary judgment. This unexplained gap in treatment is fatal to plaintiffs’ claims of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Sky Colon v. KempnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. ClaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Taylor v. TerrignoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Britton v. Villa Auto Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Henry v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Perilla v. AkandaNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API