Legal Opinion

Berry v. Stuyvesant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a covenant contained in a lease entered into between plaintiff’s intestate and the defendants. The provisions of the lease involved are as follows: “ And it is mutually covenanted and agreed, by and between the parties aforesaid, that, at the expiration of the term hereby granted, the said parties of the first part, their successors or assigns, or the owners of the reversion, shall have the full liberty and choice either to grant at the expense of the lessee, his executors, administrators or assigns, a renewal of this lease for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giles v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. People's Bank v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Bruce v. . Fulton National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Bates v. JohnstonNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel Holding Corp. v. Two Thirty Four West Forty Second Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Williams Oil Co. v. Mercer's Kwik Stop Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API